Archive April 2019

Ongoing substandard care and treatment of Immigrant Detainees at the GEO Group’s Privatized Adelanto, California Facility

During our May 2018 unannounced inspection of the Adelanto ICE Processing Center in Adelanto, California, OIG identified a number of serious issues that violate ICE’s 2011 Performance-Based National Detention Standards and pose significant health and safety risks at the facility. Specifically, we are concerned about the following:

  • Nooses in Detainee Cells (Page 3)
  • Improper and Overly Restrictive Segregation (Page 4-7)
  • Untimely and Inadequate Detainee Medical Care (Page 7-9)

The Adelanto Center was to comply with ICE’s 2011 Performance-
Based National Detention Standards, as revised in December 2016. These detention standards establish requirements for areas such as:

  • environmental health and safety: e.g., cleanliness, sanitation, security, admission into facilities, classification, detainee searches, segregation 2 (Special Management Units), and disciplinary system;
  • detainee care: e.g., food service, medical care, and personal hygiene;
  • activities: e.g., religious practices, telephone access, and visitation; and
  • grievance system.

GEO’s (a privatized federal prison) facility’s deficiency’s continue to demonstrate:

1. Under the Obama Adm., the Justice Department phased out its use of private prisons after officials concluded the facilities are both less safe and less effective at providing correctional services than those run by the government.

2. The OIG’s most recent report: 9/2018 continues to demonstrate GEO’s inability to function without oversight.

How we treat immigrants is a reflection of our core value history, is this us?

Please click the link and read the report if full.

The Benefits Of A College Program In Prison

Programs like the Education Justice Project out of St. Louis University Prison Program brought classes to Danville Correctional Center — a medium security, all male prison with about 1,700 inmates in east central Illinois, and California’s San Quentin’s ‘The last Mile’ are both great steps in addressing the recidivism paradigm.


Currently, there is no pathway ‘within the PSR’ process that addresses recidivism. This could match a defendant with a facility that supports an interest the defendant may have in either college, or in learning a specific occupational or trade.

In an attempt to positively change their and their family’s future, this would go a long way towards ensuring a successful reentry back into their communities, while being a first step towards reducing the recidivism paradigm.